Sunday, September 30, 2007

Aggressive "Yellow Out" campaign less than impressive (and Gameday photos)

Kind of what I thought would happen, really. Tell someone to do something, and the knee-jerk reaction is to do the opposite, or something completely off-the-wall. Granted, there was A LOT of yellow (including myself and Linda), but not nearly enough to make me go WOW!!!!

I think true Duck fans should already know what to wear... yellow. The campaign was a good idea, but what you throw on for Gameday should always be OREGON DUCKS no matter what the color may be. The freedom of fashion choice is a beautiful thing. That's all I'll say about that.

It was great to have College Gameday here, tough loss to Cal, but at least, we didn't slide too far in the rankings, and the Rose Bowl is still on the table. It'll take a couple of days to get that bitter taste of defeat out of my mouth, though, when the game was almost won.

On to the Team Tailgate photos -- early morning before College Gameday, Todd & Linda at the tailgate after CG, and the Oregon Marching Band played "Kashmir" and "Mighty Oregon", right in front of us! Video coming this week -- enjoy! :)

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Cal at Oregon - By The Numbers

Source: Scout.com (eDuck forums)

Here's some pretty even numbers, breaking down the closeness of Oregon and Cal.

Some numbers from the Pac-10 rankings (and national rankings):

Scoring: 1. UO 48.5 (#7 in the nation)
3. Cal 41.5 (#15 in the nation)

Scoring Defense: 3. UO 21.5 (#45 in the nation)
5. Cal 24.5 (#58 in the nation)

Passing Offense: 6. UO 237.0 (#50 in the nation)
9. Cal 213.0 (#69 in the nation)

Rushing Offense: 1. UO 299.8 (#4 in the nation)
3. Cal 213.0 (#23 in the nation)

Total Offense:1. UO 536.8 (#7 in the nation)
7. Cal 432.5 (#40 in the nation)

Passing Efficiency: 1. Dixon 188.1 (#4 in the nation)
5. Longshore 133.4 (#48 in the nation)

Pass Efficiency "D": 3. UO 109.4 (#34 in the nation)
5. Cal 123.2 (#59 in the nation)

Rush "D": 5. Cal 102.5 (#30 in the nation) - 3.2 yards per carry
8. UO 164.8 (#77 in the nation) - 4.1 yards per carry

Kick Off Returns: 1. UO 29.2 (#8 in the nation)
2. Cal 28.5 (#11 in the nation)

Punting Net: 1. UO 39.0 (#11 in the nation)
3. Cal 37.6 (#24 in the nation)

Punt Returns: 1. Cal 14.9 (#19 in the nation)
2. UO 11.3 (#44 in the nation)

KO Return Defense: 7. UO 24.38 (#96 in the nation)
9. Cal 24.70 (#98 in the nation)

3rd Down Efficiency: 3. UO 46.4 (#23 in the nation)
5. Cal 46.0 (#26 in the nation)

3rd Down Defense: 5. UO 34.8 (#43 in the nation)
6. Cal 35.6 (#49 in the nation)

Penalties Fewest: 4. UO 24 (#43 in the nation)
9. Cal 35 (#101 in the nation)

Red Zone Defense; 1. UO 66.7
2. Cal 73.7

Red Zone Offense: 6. UO 81.8
7. Cal 80.0

Time of Possession: 7. Cal 28:58 (#84 in the nation)
10. UO 27:24 (#107 in the nation)

TO Margin: 1. UO +7
1. Cal +7

Sacks: Cal (13), UO (10)

Sacks Allowed: Cal (3), UO (8)

Tackles: 02. Harper (UO): 10.5
04. Felder (Cal): 10.2
08. Willaims (Cal): 9.2
09. Ezeff (Cal): 8.8
10. Thurmond (UO): 8.2 (tie)
10. Chung (UO): 8.2
17. DeCloud (Cal): 7.2
21. Boyd (UO): 6.8
25. Thompson (Cal): 6.5
39. Tuitele (UO): 5.2
42. Hampton (Cal): 5.0
44. Byrd (UO): 4.8
46. Follett (Cal): 4.7
50. Bacon (UO); 4.5

Sacks: 4. Reed (UO): 3.0
7. Alualu (Cal): 2.5

Tackles for Loss: 1. Reed (UO): 6.0 (tie - James)
4. Faateette (UO): 5.0 (tie - Davis)

Monday, September 24, 2007

Oregon-Stanford game debacle at Magoo's, and Pac-10 TV coverage

First off, I've been to Magoo's Tavern in Salem many times to watch the Ducks play "non-televised" games, because they've been successful in finding the wild feed off of their big, ugly satellite dish in the past. Not last Saturday night, however. The game started at 7 p.m., and as of 7:45, they were still looking for it. Needless to say, many fans, including myself, left... disappointed. Did anyone else experience issues locating the Duck game on TV as well around Oregon? Did Magoo's finally ever get the feed?

Luckily, I got back my cover charge, but the game's just not the same, listening to it on the radio. OSN radio guy Jerry Allen fumbles around too much in describing the game. It's usually painful to listen to, and it takes me 30 seconds just to figure out what the play was. Watching the replay the next day just doesn't do it for me either... since the outcome had been long decided.

Which brings me to my next point, the Pac-10 prohibits more than one game to be shown on television, in the same time slot. So why in the world did the Pac-10 allow three games be scheduled at the same time, with the very first game starting at 3 p.m.? Couldn't the conference teams space out the starting time of the games, say beginning at 12:30, giving more teams the opportunity to be seen on TV? Conferences like the SEC and Big Ten are killing us in the race to televise games. That should be unacceptable to the Pac-10! If we got more games on TV, then maybe, I wouldn't have to worry about standing around in a crowded bar, wondering if a road game's available to watch live. I can just sit on my couch at home, and only concern myself with cheering on the Ducks.

At least ESPN's College GameDay is coming to Eugene this week. At least one thing's for sure... I'll be wearing something with "Oregon Ducks" on it.

Friday, September 21, 2007

Better late than never... Fresno St. @ Oregon & Sunriver

Here's some Team Tailgate pre-game of the Fresno State/Oregon game from inside Autzen (which also features an Oregon Duck sighting at the end):



Then, it was off to Sunriver (in Central Oregon) for gorgeous views of the Deschutes River, Benham Falls, and Lava Butte:

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

One of the most stupid debates right now...


I get home from Sunriver today (an anniversary trip with my wife), and I can't believe this is actually an argument among fellow Duck fans: whether to wear yellow or green for next week's home game against Cal. Now, granted, the prospect of ESPN's College Gameday coming here has everyone around here in a tizzy, but all of this talk is just plain silly. Duck Sports News, based on information they've received, said that they want to see fans in yellow (which has nothing to do with the yellow T's they're selling, hmm?) Or, some have said, wear green(!), because Cal's going to wear yellow. Ugggghhhh! Who cares!

My take is this: wear whatever the hell you want, as long as you're covered (head to toe) in ANY Oregon Duck gear for ANY future Duck game. Duh!

We still have Stanford to play, so start looking now for your favorite sports bar with the "big ugly dish" to find Saturday's game live. And we'll worry about Gameday fashion next week.

Sunday, September 09, 2007

It's official: The Michigan Wolverines really suck


This picture is worth a thousand words! To go to the Big House and make it "Our Big House" is huge!!

39-7 Ducks! 80 percent chance of a Michigan victory? Hardly. Robert Paulson and his blog can suck it!

Appalachian State and Oregon owns the Wolverines.

Monday, September 03, 2007

Pics of Team Tailgate and from the Oregon-Houston game... video to come later this week


Just a few pictures from last Saturday. It was a good time had by all, despite the lack of a Duck defense.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

The Beavers' sports bra uniforms... ugh.


I just had to photoshop this. I kept staring like a creep at these ugly "high-and-tight" sports bra unis.
The Beavs have a solid defense and running game, right up until they go against Pac-10 foes. It could be a long season for Oregon State.

Monday, August 27, 2007

New Team Tailgate logo for 2007-2008


Here's our new iron-on for the back of this year's spirit T-shirts.

Barney the Chihuahua is our mascot again, and he's ready to go!

GO DUCKS!!!!!

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

There's no escape from the Oregon/Oklahoma replay debacle

The Eugene Register-Guard has a new columnist, George Schroeder. He's taking over the writing duties from current Sports Editor Ron Bellamy, who wants to spend more time managing the sports section at the R-G. The ironic thing is that Schroeder comes to Oregon from The Oklahoman newspaper. And what does he write about in his first column? Of course, last year's Oregon/Oklahoma game.

On the surface, he seems to be a good writer, so time will tell if he does his homework, and get to know our teams and our state. It will be interesting to see how he handles the pressure of being a columnist in Oregon, where fans can be hard to deal with.

I liked what he said in this sentence though: "Evil men in swooshes did not collaborate to cheat Oklahoma. The Sooners wear Nike, too."

Too true!

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Oregon has only a 20% chance of winning at Michigan

There's this blogger who feels that the Ducks don't stand a chance in the Big House at Michigan on September 8th. He has the Wolverines possessing an 80% chance of victory. And off course, he has Michigan going undefeated all season. I don't know what blue and maize tinted-glasses he's wearing, but at the very least, I just don't see Michigan trouncing Oregon (3-4 point victory for the winner), and I think the Wolverines will LOSE at Wisconsin. No way they escape Camp Randall unscathed.

I guess everyone's got an opinion, but I feel only USC and LSU have the best chance to go undefeated in 2007.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

OSU's Sammie Stroughter makes an appearance at practice

According to the Oregonian's Beaver Blog, Oregon State Beavers' wide receiver Sammie Stroughter, who's been MIA from fall camp thus far, showed up for a few minutes at practice on Saturday, watching quietly from the end zone.

No one knows (or will say) what his deal is. Some of his teammates say he doesn't look happy. If it's serious "personal issues", I would take this year off, if I were him, and do whatever he needs to get straight. Stroughter is a great wide receiver, and his presence (under normal circumstances) would be good for the Pac-10. But if his head's not in the game, there's no sense in him being there, as a distraction to the Beavers, who are preparing for August 30th. For his sake though, I hope Stroughter gets to being back to his old self again.

Friday, August 17, 2007

Crybaby Felipe has left the Ducks Football team

Source: Register-Guard

Senior defensive end Victor Filipe, who redshirted last season due to an elbow injury, has elected to leave the UO football team in search of playing time elsewhere.

Filipe was passed on the depth chart by sophomore transfer Will Tukuafu after the first week of fall camp. Ducks coach Mike Bellotti confirmed Filipe’s departure after Friday’s morning practice.

Filipe finished his UO career with nine tackles, three for loss, including two sacks. He appeared in 21 games, with five starts.

"I wish him well and hope he finds what he’s looking for,” Bellotti said.

If it wasn’t a certainty before, I’d say this all but assures that freshman Kenny Rowe will play this fall.

The Linn-Benton and Salem-Keizer Oregon Clubs to Merge

The two Oregon Clubs (Linn-Benton and Salem-Keizer) are merging to form the Oregon Club of the Willamette Valley.

Personally, it's fine with me, because the noon-time luncheons before home games will still be at Creekside Golf Club in South Salem. It's a five-minute drive from work for me. (ha ha!)

Response to R-G guest commentary: Playing football in China will not adversely affect UO, the school

Leave it to yet another Eugene "non-sports fan" hippie academic to whine about the UO Athletic Department spending their private money, from ticket sales and donations, to consider (and possibly) going to China to play a non-conference game in 2009.

The thing is, lady, there have been money issues on the academic side of the University of Oregon since I was a student. Education is what you make of it, not what can be handed to you. The costs will continue to rise, regardless of what the athletic side does.

My solution is this: You want more money for the University? Go lobby the State Legislature and Congress for more public money, and leave the Athletic Department out of it.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Oregon Ducks Countdown to Kickoff MySpace Widget

I may be slow in finding out about this, but you can add this to your blog and/or MySpace page. You can get the code here:

http://admin.xosn.com/quest/Questionaire.dbml?&QID=2193&DB_OEM_ID=500

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Must be nice to be Phil Knight... the best owner in college sports


Through various sources, Saturday's Oregon Ducks practice will be closed to the public and the media... because practice is being held at Nike's world headquarters campus in Beaverton.

The practice may be closed to everyone else, but do you think Nike CEO Phil Knight will miss an opportunity to see "his team" in training, on his turf? Not a chance. It must be great to have that much power and influence in the Oregon athletic department.

Team Tailgate 2007 Pac-10 Preview

Ah, college football....

It's that time of year where everyone's undefeated, and everyone's going to win the national championship. Fall practices around the Pacific-10 Conference (and the country) are well underway. Soon, we will all look forward to Saturdays, with ESPN's College Gameday first thing in the morning, then tailgating at the stadium, or at home in front of the plasma widescreen.

After reading the news from camps around the Pac-10, my opinion of how each team will finish this year hasn't changed much, and is similar to the many preseason magazines off of the bookstore racks. Here's my take on how the Pac-10 will do this year in 2007 (in order of finish):

1. USC (11-2, 7-2 conf. in 2006) – In receiving all 39 first-place votes in the Pac-10 media poll, let’s just start off by saying the Trojans are loaded with talent, across the board. They return seven starters on offense, and 10 on defense. USC will have some holes to fill at wide receiver and running back, but the new players filling those spots are plenty talented, and should be fine. The Trojan defense, again, will be one of the best in the nation. How could the Trojans lose? Well, it would be because of their brutal schedule: at Nebraska, at Notre Dame, at Oregon, at California, and hosting UCLA. Any one of those games could trip USC up. And, I just found out the backup QB Mark Sanchez is hurt. Will starting QB John David Booty be able to handle the entire load for a while? I believe so. They could lose one game at worst, but will most likely go undefeated. Look for the Trojans to vie for a national title game bid. Prediction: 12-0, 9-0 Pac-10


2. California (10-3, 7-2 conf.) – The Golden Bears luckily shared the Pac-10 title in 2006 with USC, despite losing to the Trojans earlier in the season. QB Nate Longshore and WR DeSean Jackson (a Heisman Trophy candidate) are probably the best offensive tandem in the conference. Cal returns seven on offense, but only five on defense. The Bears secondary will be green, and they may have to outscore some teams this year, but they can put up some points on the scoreboard. They have to play a couple of tough midseason games on the road against Oregon and UCLA, and they’ll try to vindicate last year’s defeat to USC, but at least the game’s in Berkeley. Prediction: 10-2, 7-2 Pac-10

3. UCLA (7-6, 5-4 conf.) – The Bruins will be breaking in their new offensive coordinator, Jay Norvell, but that shouldn’t slow down this potent offense. They have enough tools to win the Pac-10 title. UCLA has 20 starters coming back (10 offense, 10 defense). There most likely is a battle going on for the starting QB job, between two talented players in Ben Olsen and Patrick Cowan, as they seek their share of the snaps. The Bruins probably have the best wide receiving corps in the conference, and have a good running back in Chris Markey. UCLA also boasts a great defensive line, with fast defensive ends and linebackers. They get Notre Dame, California, and Oregon at home, but have to go to the Coliseum to face USC. The Bruins don’t make it past Cal and USC though. Prediction: 10-2, 7-2 Pac-10

4. Oregon (7-6, 4-5 conf.) – The second-half collapse of the Ducks was hopefully a fluke, as they try to overcome their immense number of injuries and lack of confidence late in the season, that they experienced in 2006. Oregon, like UCLA, has a new offensive coordinator (and spread offense guru) in Chip Kelly. With the seven returning starters on offense, and the seven on defense, the Ducks, behind QB Dennis Dixon, need to maintain their good offensive production (#9 in NCAA total offense in 2006), and utilize the running game more, with bruiser RB’s Jonathan Stewart and Jeremiah Johnson. Special teams will hopefully improve, but remains in question, along with their depth on the defensive line. The Ducks were abysmal at stopping the run last year (ninth in the Pac-10). Oregon arguably has the best secondary in the conference, however, with Patrick Chung, Jairus Byrd, and Walter Thurmond III, each as potential All Pac-10 candidates in 2007. The Ducks have a favorable schedule, but still will have trouble at Michigan, at home versus USC, and at UCLA. Prediction: 9-3, 7-2 Pac-10

5. Arizona State (7-6, 4-5 conf.) – The lucky thing for the Sun Devils is that it’s now 2007, and they have one heck of a new head coach in Dennis Erickson. After last year’s fall camp debacle with Nebraska QB Sam Keller quitting the team, starting QB Rudy Carpenter was miserable in 2006, compared to when he shared snaps with Keller his freshman year. ASU has 10 offensive starters returning, but only six on defense. The Sun Devils feature a decent running game with RB Ryan Torain, and the entire offensive line is back, so it should give Torain room to roam. Here’s the hard part… figuring out their win and losses. Besides hosting Arizona, California and USC, the Sun Devils travel to Washington State, Oregon, and UCLA. Not a good way for Erickson to start his tenure in Tempe. Prediction: 7-5, 4-5 Pac-10

Now, a quick look at the rest of the Pac-10:

6. Washington State (6-6, 4-5 conf.) – QB Alex Brink is one of the best in the Pac-10, and could become number one on the Cougar's career passing list by year’s end. The problem is, WSU needs to work on their running game and defense. Prediction: 6-6, 4-5 Pac-10



7. Arizona (6-6, 4-5 conf.) – The Wildcats have most of their weapons coming back, but QB Willie Tuitama needs to stay healthy (and concussion-free) for Arizona to move up this list. They do have one of the better defenses in the Pac-10, however. Prediction: 6-6, 3-6 Pac-10


8. Oregon State (10-4, 6-3 conf.) – The Beavers have a great defense and excellent running game. That might be enough to win games. Or, it might not be enough. There’s a QB battle between Sean Canfield and Lyle Moevao. And what’s worse is that star WR Sammie Stroughter has been MIA from fall camp so far (no word if he’s returning), and punter Kyle Loomis has quit the team. Uh oh. Prediction: 6-6, 3-6 Pac-10

9. Washington (5-7, 3-6 conf.) – A few bright spots this year for the Huskies include a good offensive line and decent receivers. But that will only take you so far, if anointed blue-chip freshman QB Jake Locker comes out green and gets hammered by opposing defenses. If he doesn’t complete passes, and if RB Louis Rankin gets hurt again, look for head coach Tyrone Willingham to receive his walking papers. Prediction: 2-10, 2-7 Pac-10

10. Stanford (1-11, 1-8 conf.) – New head coach Jim Harbaugh said at the Pac-10 Media Day, “I will enjoy the struggle” at turning around the Cardinal. He won’t be “enjoying” anything, if his team gives up another 50 sacks as Stanford did in 2006. The Cardinal were near the bottom of the NCAA in total offense and defense last year… I don’t expect that to change this year. You’re in it for the long haul, Jimmy. Good luck getting some of Michigan's recruits. Prediction: 0-12, 0-9 Pac-10

Well, there you have it. That's my take on the Pac-10 conference. Please feel free to let me know what you think. Saturdays are coming!

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

"Casey-gate" now making Oregonian look bad, not Ducks

I think it's outstanding that Dave Frohnmayer and Pat Kilkenny of the University of Oregon are standing up to The Oregonian, and emphatically denying ever offering the baseball head coaching job to Oregon State's Pat Casey.

Any freshman journalism school student knows to check (and double check) their sources. This so-called, concocted(?) "well-placed" source that The Oregonian's Brian Meehan refers to is losing credibility by the minute. Bad reporting, Meehan... bad!